In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10200H is slightly faster than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10200H
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6 – 74 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Ryzen 3 3200G
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 3 3200G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
67 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
91%
Price, $
$64.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10200H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AM4 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
