Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Core i5-10200H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 413 days newer than Core i5-10200H.
Advantages of Core i5-10200H
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10200H - 154 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10200H - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€403.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €403.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10200H | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |