Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Core i3-8350K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €223.66 vs €1169.00
- Up to 76% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €2.07 vs €8.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 91 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8350K - 135 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
108
80%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €223.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6487 minutes ago
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6487 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8350K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |