Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1491 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Core i3-8350K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €223.66 vs €378.30
- Up to 34% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900KF - €1.37 vs €2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-8350K - 183 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
163
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €223.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6482 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.07/FPS
66%
Price, €
€378.3
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €378.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6482 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8350K | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |