Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1491 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Core i3-8100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €52.47 vs €467.41
- Up to 87% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - €0.29 vs €2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100 - 214 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
184
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7376 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.18/FPS
13%
Price, €
€467.41
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7376 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |