Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Core i3-8100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €52.47 vs €163.90
- Up to 65% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-13400F - €0.31 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Core i3-8100 - 187 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
172
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7371 minutes ago
Buy for €163.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7370 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-8100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |