Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2682 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-6320 - 135 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6320 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |