Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 2682 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Core i3-6320 - 226 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6320 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |