Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €156.31 vs €494.19
- Up to 63% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i9-14900K - €0.54 vs €1.46 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-6100 - 339 vs 289 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
289
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €156.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
339
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
37%
Price, €
€494.19
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |