Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €159.96 vs €299.88
- Up to 37% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13600KF - €0.39 vs €0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-6100 - 481 vs 405 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
405
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €159.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
481
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
63%
Price, €
€299.88
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 253 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |