Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Core i3-6100
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €156.31 vs €161.16
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 78% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - 80 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-6100 - €2.01 vs €3.47 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €156.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.16
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6100 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |