Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2767 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 62% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-5015U - 766 vs 473 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
766
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€495
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8834 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-5015U | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |