Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1693 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 15 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-5015U - 190 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€683.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €683.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-5015U | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |