In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4170 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4170
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 54 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Up to 79% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 79% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs May 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
67 FPS
56%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
56%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4170 vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4170
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4170 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700X3D Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 1st, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$117.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
