The Core i3-4160 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-9370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4160
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 54 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of the FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4160 vs FX-9370 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Core i3-4160 vs FX-9370 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4160 vs FX-9370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4160 vs FX-9370 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4160
Jul 21st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4160 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
54 W | Power Consumption | 220 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
