Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-10900 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4010U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
182
87%
Min 1% FPS
126
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-10900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-10900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $483.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
