Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i3-4005U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3065 days newer than Core i3-4005U.
Advantages of Core i3-4005U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 15 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4005U - 205 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4005U - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4005U | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |