Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3310 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 37 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 34% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-4000M - 255 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 32 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€495
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €495 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4000M | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |