Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4453 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-380M - 458 vs 365 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-380M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |