Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 3865 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 43% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-3250 - 224 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€639
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €639 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7126 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250 | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |