The Core i3-3240 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
169
89%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€173.88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Jul 21st, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.701 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3240 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |