Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3227U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3227U
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Average FPS
178
75%
Min 1% FPS
124
77%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
238
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 17 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
