Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-9900X in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-3220 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 55 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-9900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
182
90%
Min 1% FPS
126
91%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220 vs Core i9-9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $989.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
