Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Core i3-3220
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €38.26 vs €106.07
- Up to 61% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10100 - €0.34 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3220 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
111
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
39%
Price, €
€106.07
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €106.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220 | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |