In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3110M is much slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $479 cheaper!
Core i3-3110M
- Up to 87% cheaper – $69.95 vs $548.89
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.12 vs $4.12/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6 – 133 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 115% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
47%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
46%
Price, $
$69.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
133 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
100 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
12%
Value, $/FPS
$4.12/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3110M vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3110M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3110M Jun 1st, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
