In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-2367M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 17 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6 – 91 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 44% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Oct 01, 2011
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-2367M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
91 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$27.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-2367M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-2367M vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-2367M
Oct 1st, 2011
Cores
2-core
3%
L3 Cache
3 MB
1%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-2367M Oct 1st, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | TRX4 |
17W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
