In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-14100F is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-14100F
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2023
- Is 1 year and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 58 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 105 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
105 FPS
66%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
66%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-14100F vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
82%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
92%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM5 |
58 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
