Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 635 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1274 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |