Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Core i3-10300
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €204.87 vs €392.14
- Up to 40% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - €0.49 vs €0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10300 - 486 vs 422 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
422
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€204.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €204.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
60%
Price, €
€392.14
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10300 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |