Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 131 days older than Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105T - 144 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6425 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |