Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - €64.03 vs €378.30
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900KF - €0.11 vs €0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10105F - 706 vs 564 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
564
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6834 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
706
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
20%
Price, €
€378.3
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €378.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6834 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |