In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G6900 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 46 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900X
- Up to 9% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Core i9-10900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i9-10900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i9-10900X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
21%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA2066 |
46 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
