The Celeron G5900 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G5900
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G5900 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
171
96%
Min 1% FPS
115
97%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€70.33
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Celeron G5900 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G5900 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G5900 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G5900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G5900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
58 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| UHD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
