The Celeron G4900T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-6700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-6700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
169
92%
Min 1% FPS
113
93%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
184
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
€135.34
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-6700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-6700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i7-6700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-6700
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
89%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
