The Celeron G4900T is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-3550S. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron G4900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-3550S
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900T vs Core i5-3550S for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
169
99%
Min 1% FPS
113
99%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3550S
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€242.19
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900T vs Core i5-3550S in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i5-3550S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900T vs Core i5-3550S in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900T
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3550S
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3550S |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| $42.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
