Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5500 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5500 is 1917 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5500 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3930 - 306 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
306
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |