Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €21.99 vs €1169.00
- Up to 97% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.07 vs €2.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 51 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3900 - 423 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
322
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 304 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |