The Celeron G3900 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-13700, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's €317.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper – €21.99 vs €339.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-13700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-13700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
80%
Min 1% FPS
114
81%
Price, €
€21.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-13700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-13700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-13700 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-13700
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 30 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
