Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €51.37 vs €126.16
- Up to 50% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-13100 - €0.08 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 32% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 811 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
614
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8666 minutes ago
Buy for €126.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8666 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |