Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3258 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 50% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron G1610 - 159 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€493.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €493.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |