Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3564 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron B820 - 178 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B820 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |