Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3839 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron B820 - 153 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€464.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €464.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B820 | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |