Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4021 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 36% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron B815 - 490 vs 361 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
490
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |