Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2885 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Celeron B815 - 254 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€699.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €699.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |