Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2483 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Remnant II than Celeron B815 - 91 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 6 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Core i5-9600K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i5-9600K |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
