Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3081 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 17 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 11% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron 847 - 205 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 48 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
