Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3427 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 17 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 847 - 179 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 32 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1014.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,014.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 847 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |