The Celeron 4305UE is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4305UE
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4305UE vs Core i9-10900K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Average FPS
171
88%
Min 1% FPS
115
90%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, €
€480.74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
100%
Celeron 4305UE vs Core i9-10900K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4305UE vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4305UE vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4305UE
Oct 1st, 2018
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4305UE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Whiskey Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
2 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |