The Celeron 4205U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 9 7900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
76%
Min 1% FPS
111
78%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, €
€394.28
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 9 7900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Raphael |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
