Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 15 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Deathloop than Celeron 3965U - 202 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 32 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€774.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €774.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |